All web applications rely on data, and its management is
becoming a core part of a business’ strategy in an aim to get the most out of
one of their vital assets. Hence, O’Reilly
has made “data is the next Intel Inside” one of its web 2.0 patterns. Many
companies, such as Spotify, are learning to balance having a good control over
their data, whilst giving users the access and rights to their own data and the platform's, so together they can explore the Spotify's full potential.
The Platform
Spotify is a web,
desktop, and mobile application which allows users to stream millions of music
tracks; follow artists, playlists, radios, and friends, as well as share libraries
and playlists with friends. Based on a user’s activities, the application is
able to suggest other music the user may enjoy listening to. The company is
meeting one of O’Reilly’s best practices by designed their data for reuse. They
have released an API,
allowing outside developers to fetch Spotify’s data relating to artists, albums,
and single tracks and users’ personal playlists and libraries (with their
permission).
The Competition
Compared to other common music streaming platforms, Spotify
is a leader in API offerings. YouTube is one of their
main competitors, however it is focused on playing a single video (or much less
often, a playlist), instead of Spotify’s more specialised constant streaming of
audio. Both platforms allow the retrieval and streaming of tracks/videos or
playlists, however Spotify does fall behind when compared to YouTube’s Analytics API,
which allows developers to access viewing statistics, viewer demographics, and
popularity ratings.
Spotify’s other major competitor is iTunes, which also has
released an API.
However, the iTunes API has a lot fewer capabilities. Like Spotify, it allows
for developers to search the store and display a song or album’s information,
but unlike Spotify, it only allows for a small preview of a song to be played.
Most crippling though, is that Apple (the owners of iTunes) don’t allow the API
to be used for any purpose except to promote the store (even going as far as
requiring an iTunes icon displayed wherever it’s used), and explicitly banning
entertainment usage. This means that Apple is missing out on many opportunities
for its data to be used and exposed to developers with ideas, allowing for
Spotify to swoop in and gain a huge market share.
The Future
One best practice Spotify must work on is allowing users to
control their own data. For example, there is no way for a playlist to be
exported to another application such as iTunes or Windows Media Player, even if
it consists entirely of the user’s own locally stored music files. Another
possible future direction for the platform is focusing on another best
practice, enhancing their core data, by creating opportunities for users to
make more explicit inputs, such as ratings and reviews.
What are your opinions on Spotify's use of its data? Let me know in the comments.
No comments:
Post a Comment